Hi,
Yes, i also agree with this approach.
Regards,
Carlos
On Sun, 1 Jun 2025, Gert Doering wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, Jun 01, 2025 at 09:43:31AM -0500, David Farmer wrote:
Maybe something long the lines "for subsequent ASNs, the requestor needs
to document why existing ASNs can not be used"? There is some leeway in
evaluating, and it might spur the requestor into actually thinking "why
can I not use one of the ones I already have?" - writing down a reason
often helps in reconsidering what one really wants :-)
When requesting an additional ASN, asking how your current ASNs are used
doesn't seem unreasonable. Your old ASNs would not be reclaimed if they are
not being used. However, the new request should be denied if you
already have an unused ASN that could be used instead of requesting
an additional ASN.
This is along the lines I was thinking, so, this would work for me :-)
Gert Doering
-- NetMaster
--
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?
SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard,
Karin Schuler, Sebastian Cler
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
-----
To unsubscribe from this mailing list or change your subscription options,
please visit:
https://mailman.ripe.net/mailman3/lists/address-policy-wg.ripe.net/
As we have migrated to Mailman 3, you will need to create an account with the email matching your subscription before you can change your settings.
More details at: https://www.ripe.net/membership/mail/mailman-3-migration/
