Hi, On Fri, Oct 18, 2024 at 10:35:56PM +0200, Daniel Suchy via address-policy-wg wrote: > Sure, members doesn't need that now. Currently we're talking about huge > allocations compared to IPv4. > > But... > > Aren't we just slaves of our past based in IPv4 world, which in the fact > created us? > > It's just a philosophical question.
"Wouldn't it be nice!" is not a good argument for stockpiling 100+ /29s.
RIPE policies still operate based on need, even if that is applied much
more loose on IPv6. Demonstrate need.
IPv6 policies can (and do) change over time, if need changes, or more
experience leads to different views on the policy (/35 -> /32 -> /29),
but "we do not need that now" is not a very compelling argument.
Gert Doering
-- NetMaster
--
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?
SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Ingo Lalla,
Karin Schuler, Sebastian Cler
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
----- To unsubscribe from this mailing list or change your subscription options, please visit: https://mailman.ripe.net/mailman3/lists/address-policy-wg.ripe.net/ As we have migrated to Mailman 3, you will need to create an account with the email matching your subscription before you can change your settings. More details at: https://www.ripe.net/membership/mail/mailman-3-migration/
