Le Fri, Apr 19, 2024 at 03:41:03PM +0200, Tobias Fiebig via address-policy-wg a écrit : > Dear Colleagues, > > at RIPE87 in Rome we discussed several pathways forward for the IPv6 > address policy in the NCC region. I suggested to take a look at the > IPv6 PI policy. > > Over the past months I have been collecting perspectives and ideas > which I aggregated to a suggested set of changes which I would like to > start discussing on the ML prior to RIPE88, to see whether these > directions work for the community, and how to improve them. > > Please note that this is not a formal proposal, but a work-in-progress > as a basis for further discussion. > > I am tracking the development of the text in git; Additionally, I also > attached the corresponding files. > > Individual suggestions can be found here; Each .patch contains more > detailed reasoning along with the proposed change. > > https://git.as59645.net/tfiebig/ripe-738-pi-update/src/branch/draft-04/individual_changes > > And the overall diff here: > > https://git.as59645.net/tfiebig/ripe-738-pi-update/src/branch/draft-04/draft_changes/initial_version-to-draft-04 > > # The core changes proposed are: >
Reads reasonable. -- Denis Fondras / Liopen -- To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder, or change your subscription options, please visit: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/address-policy-wg
