On 2023 Sep 11 (Mon) at 19:14:05 +0200 (+0200), denis walker wrote: :On Mon, 11 Sept 2023 at 18:33, Peter Hessler <[email protected]> wrote: :> :> On 2023 Sep 11 (Mon) at 16:09:58 +0000 (+0000), Brian Storey wrote: :> :Does this not contradict other purposes / objectives of the registry, including the principles of registering public networks or am I missing something? :> : :> :> This behaves the same as the IPv6 version, which has not had this :> problem yet. : :Maybe because IPv4 is still dominant for networks... :
That should not be a blocker for this policy. And if a solution is needed/found, then it should be in a different policy that fixes it for both. -- Just remember: when you go to court, you are trusting your fate to twelve people that weren't smart enough to get out of jury duty! -- To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder, or change your subscription options, please visit: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/address-policy-wg
