Hi, On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 03:03:05PM +0100, Albanian Hosting SH.P.K. via address-policy-wg wrote: > Very interesting! Good catch. And thank you for the information provided, i > personally believe that there is no help as because nobody cares at least > not the RIPE NCC itself. I do believe that we all are wasting our time > here, as long as my small company need a /22 allocation and cannot get it, > it's worthless. We are renting them from others in order to survive!
If you have read this thread, you might have noticed that people *do* care.
It's just not very clear what can be done, at this point in time, which
will have a positive effect.
There's lots of things that can be done that have negative effects
(like, etra bureaucracy, which increases costs, which then leads to
complaints about, well, bureaucracy) but have very little effect on
the problem statement: networks getting "more than one /24" for the
same entity.
The problem statement is not as clear cut as it might seem... if a parent
company opens a new subsidiary in every european country, which has their
own network, budget, CEO... shouldn't they be entitled to have a LIR
account and a /24 for each subsidiary?
... and, of course, it's not like we haven't been telling people since
15+ years that IPv4 is going to run out, and they should use IPv6.
Gert Doering
-- NetMaster
--
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?
SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael Emmer
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder, or change your subscription options, please visit: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/address-policy-wg
