Hello,
After reading the prupose and some archive on this mailing (you can over
ripe website) , i have an idea about the reason of prupose.
The /24 proposal is for emergency when ripe run out of V4 (5M address
now, aprox 5K new LIR).
Why not doing a prupose based on LIR, a first lir account receive a /22,
if a same entity open a second account, they only receive a /24.
That prupose is to avoid some LIR with huge amount take all space and
let's nothing for small LIR wo can't do.
Actualy a /22 from RIPE cost 4800€ VAT EXCL (2 year + setup) , on market
it's 15- 20K€
I know some company can have multiple entity to buy extra range. Some
company is cheap to register like in UK.
Maybe use company UBO registry obligation in EU can fight that ?
Best regards
Cedric
Le 06-02-19 à 00:19, Carlos Friaças via address-policy-wg a écrit :
I was unaware about this list limitation, but hope this helps... :-)
Regards,
Carlos
=========
Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2019 18:18:45
From: Michael Kafka <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: [address-policy-wg] New on this list, cannot reply to old topic
Hi everyone,
I'd like to join the discussion here on the list but I just registered
so I can't reply to the existing topic and I don't want to start a new
thread.
For the sake of a clean thread, can someone please reply to:
[address-policy-wg] 2019-02 New Policy Proposal (Reducing IPv4
Allocations to a /24)
Thanks, MiKa
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2019 12:04:26
From: Marco Schmidt <[email protected]>
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: [address-policy-wg] 2019-02 New Policy Proposal (Reducing IPv4
Allocations to a /24)
Dear colleagues,
A new RIPE Policy proposal, 2019-02, "Reducing IPv4 Allocations to a /24"
is now available for discussion.
This proposal aims to reduce the IPv4 allocation size to a /24 once the
RIPE NCC is unable to allocate contiguous /22 ranges.
You can find the full proposal at:
https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2019-02
As per the RIPE Policy Development Process (PDP), the purpose of this
four week Discussion Phase is to discuss the proposal and provide
feedback to the proposer.
At the end of the Discussion Phase, the proposer, with the agreement of
the WG Chairs, will decide how to proceed with the proposal.
We encourage you to review this proposal and send your comments to
<[email protected]> before 5 March 2019.
Regards,
Marco Schmidt
Policy Officer
