May we do it for 2015-01? For example it would help to switch to IPv6, but the NCC wants to earn money and don't think about the community. :)
(Technically, it could still run through an appeals process, though the question is "what for?" since nobody had any objections) чт, 30 Авг 2018 г., 16:26 Gert Doering <[email protected]>: > Hi, > > On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 09:55:52PM -0700, Elvis Daniel Velea wrote: > > while this was more of a cosmetic change and while this proposal did > > have support an no objections, I think that 4-5 e-mails of support > > should have at least required an extended discussion/review phase. > > This is a statement that should have been voiced after Erik's summary > at the end of the review phase (and I do agree in principle that > "more voices of support" would have been welcome). > > *Now* is too late for the WG chairs to do anything about it. The PDP for > this proposal has concluded. > > (Technically, it could still run through an appeals process, though the > question is "what for?" since nobody had any objections) > > > > Especially since in last call nobody said a word. > > Last call does not require anyone to say anything. This is stated > very explicitely in the PDP. > > Gert Doering > -- NetMaster > -- > have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? > > SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael > Emmer > Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann > D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) > Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279 >
