Chairs, This is a notice that the DTN WG document is now in the editor's queue for publication and also a bug/reminder about progressing the ACME WG document since it is no longer blocked.
Thanks for consideration. Brian S. From: Sipos, Brian J. <brian.si...@jhuapl.edu> Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2024 12:51 PM To: acme-cha...@ietf.org Cc: IETF ACME <acme@ietf.org> Subject: [EXT] Alert-Verify-Sender: [Acme] ACME DTN-Node-ID validation Chairs, The DTN Node ID validation document [1] is about to expire but its companion document [2] in the DTN WG just passed IESG review along with some editorial comments from IANA. To keep the ACME document alive I am going to update it with those IANA terminology fixes but not change the normative content of the draft. With the companion document now passed IESG review I think the ACME draft is also ready for IESG review and can be "unstuck" from its current holding pattern. Does this sound like a good plan? Thanks, Brian S. [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-acme-dtnnodeid/ [2] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dtn-bpv7-admin-iana/
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ Acme mailing list -- acme@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to acme-le...@ietf.org
