Why aren't we talking about going to DANE instead?

thx ..Tom (mobile)

On Thu, Jul 25, 2024, 3:34 PM Matthew McPherrin <mattm=
40letsencrypt....@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:

> My primary concern with "moving beyond the CSR" is that it's a defacto
> standard which is widely supported today, so we should make sure that (at
> least for the most part), an ACME client can still take a CSR and transform
> it into whatever public key format is required.  But if the ACME client
> doesn't have access to the webserver private key, completing some different
> PoP is going to be challenging.
>
> It seems most of the trouble adopting ACME today is in more "appliance"
> type contexts, where CSR interoperability is a big win.  So I think we need
> to be cautious about simplifying ACME in a way that harms its adoption,
> even if it is overall simplified.
>
> On Wed, Jul 24, 2024 at 7:17 PM Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca>
> wrote:
>
>>
>> Aaron Gable <aa...@letsencrypt.org> wrote:
>>     > For example, I hope to introduce a proposal for a "pubkey"
>> identifier
>>     > type, so that TLS ACME clients can submit their pubkey at newOrder
>>     > time. This would remove the last field that the ACME CA truly
>> relies on
>>     > the CSR for, allowing ACME Servers to ignore the CSR entirely if
>> they
>>     > so wished. It also has the added benefit of letting clients prove
>> that
>>     > they control the corresponding private key (by fulfilling an ACME
>>     > Challenge for the pubkey identifier, e.g. by conducting a TLS
>> handshake
>>     > with that key), which the current CSR transmission mechanism does
>> not
>>     > do.
>>
>> I'm all for moving beyond the CSR!
>> I think having something that can be used in ACME and also in other
>> enrolling
>> protocols would be useful though.
>>
>> RFC7030bis has been talked about.
>>
>> --
>> Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
>>  -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-                      *I*LIKE*TRAINS*
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Acme mailing list -- acme@ietf.org
>> To unsubscribe send an email to acme-le...@ietf.org
>>
> _______________________________________________
> RATS mailing list -- r...@ietf.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to rats-le...@ietf.org
>
_______________________________________________
Acme mailing list -- acme@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to acme-le...@ietf.org

Reply via email to