Hiya,
On 04/06/2023 12:06, Deb Cooley wrote:
This will be a two week call for adoption ending on 16 June. Please speak up either for or against adopting this draft.
I had a read of the draft. I support adoption. I'm not sure I understand the security of the challenge schemes sufficiently from reading the draft, but that's something that can be addressed as the WG works on it. To be clear: I'm not asking that the draft fully set out why these challenge types are (or are not, for dns-01) secure, but I reckon it's important the WG satisfy itself about that as the work proceeds, given that have been subtle issues with challenges in the past. There're also some terminology things to get right, e.g. that .onion is not a TLD but a special-use domain name. (SUDNs are controversial enough things that it'll be worth trying to get that text to where it irritates the smallest number of people possible, even if that'll never be zero:-) Cheers, S.
Thanks, Deb _______________________________________________ Acme mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
OpenPGP_0xE4D8E9F997A833DD.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Acme mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
