> On 12 May 2023, at 03:30, Melinda Shore <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 5/11/23 3:52 PM, Antonios Chariton wrote: >> What do you think about the naming? Do you perceive “DNS-02” as an improved >> version, or as a second option? We are happy to rename this to DNS-02 and we >> have no plans of breaking any ACME server or client already using DNS-01 :) > > For the exceedingly little it's worth, I've always thought of those > integers as type labels rather than version numbers (I'm not sure > that versioning challenges makes that much sense, given how their > labels are conveyed by the protocol). Let's say that this is named > dns-02, then a problem is discovered with dns-01 that would cause it > to be deprecated and a new new dns challenge is rolled out that is > substantially similar, but called dns-03. How is that actually a > problem? > > Melinda
Thanks for the e-mail Melinda. I also see it like that myself, and I don’t feel like there’s a problem. I’m happy to rename this to DNS-02 if there aren’t any objections. Antonis _______________________________________________ Acme mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
