The client draft is adopted as a WG item, so if the WG would like to move in that direction, I am of course happy to support it. If it makes sense to keep the client focused authentication challenges as a separate draft, that is fine too. Additional reviews on the existing text would be good or just a sign of support so it can move forward if it's helpful. It has had a fair number of reviews, so it may be that it's simple and there's not too much more to do, but reviews and understanding support would be very helpful.
Best regards, Kathleen On Sun, Apr 10, 2022 at 10:11 AM Anders Rundgren < [email protected]> wrote: > On 2022-04-10 13:16, Paul van Brouwershaven wrote: > > I agree that this would be an extremely useful addition! > > Indeed, and it has been suggested before as well :) > https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/acme/HlTySQxLUKcLOduqn-pEKDELjtA/ > > Anders > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > *From:* Acme <[email protected]> on behalf of Carl Wallace < > [email protected]> > > *Sent:* Friday, April 8, 2022 5:00:27 PM > > *To:* [email protected] <[email protected]> > > *Subject:* [Acme] draft-ietf-acme-client-05 and key attestations > > Given draft-ietf-acme-client-05 addresses provisioning device > certificates and client certificates and both may be issued for keys that > reside on mobile devices that support key attestation, would it make sense > to include means of conveying key attestations to this draft? This wouldn’t > align with the authentication aim of the draft, but may be a useful > addition overall. > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Acme mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme < > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme> > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Acme mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme > > _______________________________________________ > Acme mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme > -- Best regards, Kathleen
_______________________________________________ Acme mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
