Hi!

We’re past IETF LC in terms of document processing and -08 and -09 appear to 
have changed protocol behavior.  Since there hasn’t been any discussion about 
this on the mailing list yet, I’d like to ask the WG to review these changes 
(https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=draft-ietf-acme-dtnnodeid-07&url2=draft-ietf-acme-dtnnodeid-09).
  Please raise any objections by Friday April 1.

Helpfully, this document is on the ACME meeting agenda tomorrow at IETF 113.

Regards,
Roman

From: Acme <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Brian Sipos
Sent: Wednesday, March 2, 2022 11:27 PM
To: IETF ACME <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [Acme] I-D Action: draft-ietf-acme-dtnnodeid-09.txt

All,
I have posted an update to the Node ID Validation document which updates 
references to now-published DTN RFCs (yay!) and adds algorithm agility for the 
Key Authorization Digest to avoid the validation method being stuck on SHA-256. 
It does add a publication dependency on the COSE hash document, but that is in 
AUTH48 (though it's been stuck in that state for some time now).
Comments are welcome and can be discussed at the next IETF.
Brian S.

On Wed, Mar 2, 2022 at 7:35 PM 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Automated Certificate Management Environment 
WG of the IETF.

        Title           : Automated Certificate Management Environment (ACME) 
Delay-Tolerant Networking (DTN) Node ID Validation Extension
        Author          : Brian Sipos
        Filename        : draft-ietf-acme-dtnnodeid-09.txt
        Pages           : 31
        Date            : 2022-03-02

Abstract:
   This document specifies an extension to the Automated Certificate
   Management Environment (ACME) protocol which allows an ACME server to
   validate the Delay-Tolerant Networking (DTN) Node ID for an ACME
   client.  The DTN Node ID is encoded as a certificate Subject
   Alternative Name (SAN) of type otherName with a name form of
   BundleEID and as an ACME Identifier type "bundleEID".


The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-acme-dtnnodeid/

There is also an HTML version available at:
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-acme-dtnnodeid-09.html

A diff from the previous version is available at:
https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-acme-dtnnodeid-09


Internet-Drafts are also available by rsync at rsync.ietf.org::internet-drafts


_______________________________________________
Acme mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
_______________________________________________
Acme mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme

Reply via email to