J.C. Jones <[email protected]> wrote: > Hence, I propose we add an optional field to the ARI response > structure, "explanationURL", which when populated should be presented > in any user-visible context (logging, alerting, etc) by the > ARI-compatible client. It would be up to the Certificate Authority to > ensure the URL presented appropriately translated information for the > operator, and the CA _should_ only provide the field if there was > something exceptional that warranted additional explanation or > context.
Sounds good. If it's for human consumption, then it might need to be an array or dict, with per-language versions. -- Michael Richardson <[email protected]> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting ) Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Acme mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
