I also prefer 8499 terminology. Yours, Daniel On Fri, Dec 10, 2021 at 4:40 AM Owen Friel (ofriel) <ofriel= [email protected]> wrote:
> I mentioned it at IETF 112 that we needed to decide on use of RFC8499 vs. > CA/B forum terminology in the document. > > > > As this document is not specific to Web PKI use cases, I prefer RFC8499 > terminology. > > > > Martin expressed that preference too: > https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/acme/Yh1YbtqZy9rwOmInU1KyJdADTE4/ > > > > For acme-integrations, Deb also preferred RFC8499: > https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/acme/Hj1PwYuO0zWdXG4HOPGOs8cVNw4/ > > > > So unless I hear otherwise, I will publish a draft-01 with updated RFC8499 > terminology, that also addresses Daniels comments > https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/acme/Px0d5MG5_fC490PmEUSRAcsCAF0/ , > before the holiday break. > > > > Cheers, > > Owen > _______________________________________________ > Acme mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme > -- Daniel Migault Ericsson
_______________________________________________ Acme mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
