Hi Thomas! > -----Original Message----- > From: Thomas Fossati <[email protected]> > Sent: Monday, March 8, 2021 8:13 AM > To: Roman Danyliw <[email protected]>; Yaron Sheffer <[email protected]>; > IETF ACME <[email protected]> > Cc: Thomas Fossati <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [Acme] AD Review: draft-ietf-acme-star-delegation-04 > > Hi Roman, > > On 08/03/2021, 12:50, "Roman Danyliw" <[email protected]> wrote: > > Thanks for adding the new CDDL schema and clean-up to the JSON schema. > > This resolves all of my feedback from AD review. I will advance the > > document to IETF LC. > > Thank you! > > > One question I have in the -06 to -07 changes is why the use of IP > > addresses was dropped for subjectAltName in the CSR template (the > > addition of URI makes sense). > > For the full context of where this choice originated, see: > > https://github.com/yaronf/I-D/pull/132#discussion_r584316393
Thanks for the pointer. I see that Yaron posed the same question that I did in the github discussion. That explanation works for me. Regards, Roman > Note that we added an explicit extension point to the subjectAltName Type > (subjectaltname-extension) where, if needed, IPs could be added back by a > future spec: > > $$subjectaltname-extension //= ( > ? IP: [ 1* regtext ] > ) > > cheers, t > > > > > > > IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are > confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended > recipient, > please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any > other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any > medium. Thank you. _______________________________________________ Acme mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
