Hi Alexey! > -----Original Message----- > From: Acme <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Alexey Melnikov > Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2020 11:38 AM > To: Roman Danyliw <[email protected]>; IETF ACME <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [Acme] AD Review of draft-ietf-acme-email-smime-07 > > Hi Roman, > > On 22/05/2020 15:54, Roman Danyliw wrote:
[snip] > > ** Section 7. Per "Any claims about the correctness or > > fitness-for-purpose > of the email address must be otherwise assured", I don't follow the intent of > this text. For example, what is the "correctness ... of the email address"? > What > is meant by "assurances"? > > This was based on feedback from one of reviewers. It is basically saying > that issued ACME certificates don't vouch for anything other than "this > email seems to belong to the entity that requested it". Does this make > sense? This cautionary clarification makes more sense to me. Can you fold in some language to that effect into a revision. Given that this is the last of that changes, this update can be made with other IETF LC feedback. Thanks, Roman > Best Regards, > > Alexey > > > _______________________________________________ > Acme mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme _______________________________________________ Acme mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
