Hi!

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Salz, Rich [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Monday, September 23, 2019 4:04 PM
> To: [email protected]; Roman Danyliw <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [Acme] New STAR draft
> 
> Hearing no complaints, the modifications in the current draft pass the
> abbreviated second WGLC.
> 
> Roman, how do you want to handle the next step?

I appreciate the updates to the draft.  These were worth making.  I've advanced 
the document to be on next week's telechat.

Roman

> On 9/20/19, 11:05 AM, "Salz, Rich" <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>     Reminder, please speak up by Monday or we will call consensus.
> 
>     On 9/17/19, 1:17 PM, "Salz, Rich" <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>         This came up during IESG/IETF last calls.
> 
>         Most of the changes are editorial, such as changing some of the field
> names in the JSON structures etc (e.g., recurrent to auto-renewal). But a
> couple are operational and CA/B forum compliance.
> 
>         Quoting the summary of changes:
>                                  o  STAR Order and Directory Meta attributes
> renamed slightly and
>                                     grouped under two brand new "auto-renewal"
> objects;
>                                  o  IANA registration updated accordingly 
> (note that
> two new
>                                     registries have been added as a 
> consequence);
> 
>                                  o  Unbounded pre-dating of certificates 
> removed so
> that STAR certs
>                                     are never issued with their notBefore in 
> the past;
> 
>                                  o  Changed "recurrent" to "autoRenewal" in 
> error
> codes;
>                                  o  Changed "recurrent" to "auto-renewal" in
> reference to Orders;
>                                  o  Added operational considerations for HTTP
> caches.
> 
>         If anyone in the working group dislikes these changes, please speak up
> by Monday.
> 
>         Thanks.
> 
>               /r$, co-chair
> 
>         On 9/17/19, 11:02 AM, "[email protected]" <internet-
> [email protected]> wrote:
> 
> 
>             A new version (-09) has been submitted for draft-ietf-acme-star:
>             https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-acme-star-09.txt
> 
> 
>             The IETF datatracker page for this Internet-Draft is:
>             https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-acme-star/
> 
>             Diff from previous version:
>             https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-acme-star-09
> 
>             Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of
> submission
>             until the diff is available at tools.ietf.org.
> 
>             IETF Secretariat.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>     _______________________________________________
>     Acme mailing list
>     [email protected]
>     https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
> 

_______________________________________________
Acme mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme

Reply via email to