On 11/09/2019, 18:40, "Salz, Rich" <[email protected]> wrote: > > the protocol is still correct/consistent. But, let's be bold as > > it's probably worth taking the risk :-) > > We can ask that the IESG/IETF do a simultaneous re-review period of > something like two weeks.
Sounds good, thank you. IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you. _______________________________________________ Acme mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
