Hi all, Could I have 10 mins to cover: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-friel-acme-integrations-01
There is some overlap with https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-yusef-acme-3rd-party-device-attestation-01 and https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-moriarty-acme-client/ and we are having offline discussion with Kathleen and Rifaat on how to align all 3. Thanks, Owen From: Acme <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Yoav Nir Sent: 11 July 2019 20:50 To: IETF ACME <[email protected]> Subject: [Acme] Agenda for IETF 105 Hi, all We are putting together the agenda for IETF 105. The current plan is to have presentation and agenda time for email and for telephony. There is still time on the agenda to cover more topics, so if you think they should be brought up, please reply either to this thread, or directly to Rich and me: · draft-ietf-acme-tls-alpn seems to be stalled for months. We’ve had a change of AD and a new AD review ([1]). Can allocating meeting time help with progressing this? · draft-ietf-acme-star is in IETF LC with no significant issues having come up. Unless the authors think otherwise, I don’t see a need to allocate agenda time at this point. · draft-ietf-acme-ip is waiting for an AD write-up and to progress it. Unless Roland feels differently, I don’t think there’s much to spend agenda time on. · draft-ietf-acme-caa is in the RFC editor’s queue. So, all good? If you have some other business for the WG meeting, please bring it up now. Thanks Rich & Yoav [1] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/acme/YW9rho7i1YjLd32k-MDYX4p2dSU
_______________________________________________ Acme mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
