Salz, Rich <[email protected]> wrote:
    mcr>     Given that TLS would forbid SNI being present in that case, how
    mcr> would such a offboard TLS termination work?

    rsalz> Probably violating the RFC?  "We're not the protocol police"

Okay, then just put the SNI for the challenge too :-)


-- 
Michael Richardson <[email protected]>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-



Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Acme mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme

Reply via email to