On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 01:25:06PM +0000, Salz, Rich wrote: > * This would be my preference. I don't think the base > specification should change this close to last call > for this case. > > I agree. If we need to fix things after the STAR document > becomes an RFC, we can publish an errata.
Or have the STAR document explicitly call that it controverts this requirement. I think that is a good idea to explicitly call conflicting requirements (and I have seen examples of trouble when this has not been done because implementers were just confused). -Ilari _______________________________________________ Acme mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
