On 27/06/2018 16:57, Salz, Rich wrote: > Can the authors of each draft please send a brief (one or two sentences > is fine) status to the mailing list about their drafts? Also indicate > if you want WG time to present, talk about issues, etc. We are scheduled > to meet during the Tuesday afternoon session, from 17:20-18:20 (last > hour, after oauth).
Sadly I have a conflict with ACME, but here is status of my documents: [snip] > draft-ietf-acme-email-smime-02 Details of the challenge email need to be flashed out. I am talking to people who offered to co-edit the document. > draft-ietf-acme-email-tls-04 I think this document is ready for WGLC. I have a couple of open issues, but I don't think they prevent WGLC. The two issues are: 1) Is it possible to make ACME issue a single certificate for multiple related services running on the same host, e.g. for IMAP and IMAPS or for IMAP and POP3? A single certificate with DNS-ID would cover all services automatically, but if we want to allow for a finegrainer control using SRV-ID, there has to be a way to list all services that a certificate has to cover. Is this problem worth solving? If yes, what is the best way of doing this? One possible way of doing this is to rename/extend "service" JWS header parameter to be a comma separated list of services. 2) I would like the document to support LMTP (RFC 2033, effectively this is a variant of SMTP, however in order to do this, I need to register "lmtp" service and possibly a default port. Best Regards, Alexey _______________________________________________ Acme mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
