There is an IETF erratum for RFC 6844 (specifically, erratum 5200: 
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5200) regarding a contradiction about 
which character is used as a parameter delimiter in "issue"/"issuewild" 
property tags (section 3 defines the parameter delimiter as a semicolon, 
whereas section 5.2 defines it as whitespace). Given that the RFC in its 
current state is contradictory, I imagine this is something that should be 
resolved before any proposals regarding parameters are finalized.

I proposed a fix to the ABNF grammar on the LAMPS WG mailing list last month to 
make the parameter delimiter defined in section 5.2 align with section 3: 
https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/spasm/current/msg01073.html. It would be 
trivial to modify this grammar to allow for hyphens to appear in parameter 
tags. Allowing for the use hyphens in tags would be win in terms of human 
readability of CAA records, as I believe "validation-methods" is much more 
readable than "validationmethods", etc.

Thanks,
Corey

 
Corey Bonnell
Senior Software Engineer
t: +1 412.395.2233

Trustwave | SMART SECURITY ON DEMAND

On 1/18/18, 7:47 PM, "Acme on behalf of Jacob Hoffman-Andrews" 
<[email protected] on behalf of [email protected]> wrote:

    I don't think that's been discussed before. I think it's reasonable to
    adjust "account-uri" to "accounturi" and "validation-methods" to
    "validationmethods" to stick with RFC6844's definitions.
    
    On 01/18/2018 06:56 AM, Ivan Vyshnevskyi wrote:
    > Hi,
    >
    > According to the grammar for value of the CAA issue property, that is 
defined in
    > the section 5.2 of RFC6844[1], the parameter name (there called “tag”) 
consists
    > of one or more alphanumeric characters. The most current version of
    > the draft-ietf-acme-caa[2] introduces two parameter names with hyphens
    > in them: “account-uri” and “validation-methods”.
    >
    > Was this discrepancy discussed before? Is there a plan to resolve it?
    >
    > Regards,
    > Ivan
    >
    > [1]: 
https://scanmail.trustwave.com/?c=4062&d=hcDh2k_3IAMjh0nijx3Ip1gY1VC-548bPX2OlnrCzQ&s=5&u=https%3a%2f%2ftools%2eietf%2eorg%2fhtml%2frfc6844%23section-5%2e2
    > [2]: 
https://scanmail.trustwave.com/?c=4062&d=hcDh2k_3IAMjh0nijx3Ip1gY1VC-548bPX3SnnvOkA&s=5&u=https%3a%2f%2ftools%2eietf%2eorg%2fhtml%2fdraft-ietf-acme-caa-03
    >
    > _______________________________________________
    > Acme mailing list
    > [email protected]
    > 
https://scanmail.trustwave.com/?c=4062&d=hcDh2k_3IAMjh0nijx3Ip1gY1VC-548bPSvfn3DDxg&s=5&u=https%3a%2f%2fwww%2eietf%2eorg%2fmailman%2flistinfo%2facme
    
    _______________________________________________
    Acme mailing list
    [email protected]
    
https://scanmail.trustwave.com/?c=4062&d=hcDh2k_3IAMjh0nijx3Ip1gY1VC-548bPSvfn3DDxg&s=5&u=https%3a%2f%2fwww%2eietf%2eorg%2fmailman%2flistinfo%2facme
    

_______________________________________________
Acme mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme

Reply via email to