On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 02:34:45PM -0400, Richard Barnes wrote: > This seems sensible; rolling keys shouldn't invalidate things in transit > any more than changing your Gmail password should delete your drafts folder. > > I would have a little bit of a hard time calling this "purely editorial", > since it specifies server behavior. But it seems like you're just > codifying an expectation that at least I already had (TBH, I would not have > thought to build a server otherwise), so I would be inclined to go ahead > and merge it if at least one or two other people chime in. > > Here's a PR: https://github.com/ietf-wg-acme/acme/pull/323
If there is pending validation over key change, which key hash should the validation use when it is resolved? The old one? The new one? -Ilari _______________________________________________ Acme mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
