> The two last ones are editorial, but the first about enumerating all BR > methods isn't (since it needs new validation method identifiers).
Thinking about it a bit more, I don't think it is appropriate for ACME to list CABF things. That's a strong view as an individual, and a moderate view as a WG chair. _______________________________________________ Acme mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
