On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 11:46:10PM +0000, Zach Shepherd wrote:
> If this sort of "stateless" server is acceptable, why do we require
> 128 bits of entropy for the token?
 
CAB Forum Baseline Requirements.

> * - If stateless http clients are acceptable, why not stateless DNS
> clients? I think allowing administrators to set a single TXT record
> containing the account key thumbprint and have it be re-used for
> multiple challenges would make it much more feasible to use the DNS
> challenge in environments where DNS management access is tightly
> controlled.

Again, CAB Forum Baseline Requirements.


-Ilari

_______________________________________________
Acme mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme

Reply via email to