Fulfilling my promise made the other day ?  A PR to address the CAA issue.


Rich's new text reads as follows: "Further, an ACME-based CA can use the Certification Authority Authorization record {{!RFC6844}} to prevent it from being misdirected and generate an unauthorized issuance."

IMHO we need a "SHOULD" here. If you're an ACME server, there's no reason to ignore CAA records. Especially since we are looking into adding ACME-specific information into these records, in draft-ietf-acme-caa-01.

Thanks,
        Yaron

_______________________________________________
Acme mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme

Reply via email to