> This is a good point. Should we register x-pem-file as part of this RFC? Or > come up with a new, more specific media type, like > application/pem-certificate-chain?
Of the two options my vote would be for `application/pem-certificate-chain` as the better choice. On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 4:51 PM, Jacob Hoffman-Andrews <[email protected]> wrote: > >From the WGLC thread, Russ Housley said: > > > Section 6.4.2 says: > > The default format of the certificate is PEM (application/x-pem-file) > > as specified by [RFC7468]. ... The client may request other formats by > > including an Accept header in its request. For example, the client > > may use the media type application/pkix-cert to request the end- > > entity certificate in DER format. > > > > RFC 7468 defines the textual encoding for certificates, but it does not > define the application/x-pem-file media type. I cannot find a registration > for the application/x-pem-file media type. > > This is a good point. Should we register x-pem-file as part of this RFC? > Or come up with a new, more specific media type, like > application/pem-certificate-chain? > > _______________________________________________ > Acme mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme >
_______________________________________________ Acme mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
