On Thu, 28 Jul 2016 17:54:19 -0400 Richard Barnes <[email protected]> wrote:
> At the meeting, my slides on un-parallelizing roll-over were > ambiguous as to what would be signed and carried where in my > proposal. Rather than trying to paraphrase again, I just wrote up a > PR that implements the proposal. > > #164 - Unparallelize signatures on key-change > https://github.com/ietf-wg-acme/acme/pull/164 > > Let me know if that clarifies things, and if folks agree that it's a > good idea. This looks sane to me, and easier to implement than the current rollover mechanism. Regards, Andrew _______________________________________________ Acme mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
