Hi all, I strongly support the ACME work. Certificate management is something that really benefits from standardization and automatization.
We have some additional use cases that we think should be included and that clearly falls into the ACME use case "obtaining certificates for Web sites". I wrote a short draft that illustrates the scenarios. Please comment. Would be happy to give a short (5min?) presentation at the BoF. Cheers, John Begin forwarded message: From: <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> To: John Mattsson <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, John Mattsson <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, Robert Skog <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, "Robert Skog" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: New Version Notification for draft-mattsson-acme-use-cases-00.txt Date: 9 Mar 2015 20:57:54 CET A new version of I-D, draft-mattsson-acme-use-cases-00.txt has been successfully submitted by John Mattsson and posted to the IETF repository. Name: draft-mattsson-acme-use-cases Revision: 00 Title: Additional Use Cases for Automatic Certificate Management (ACME) Document date: 2015-03-09 Group: Individual Submission Pages: 6 URL: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-mattsson-acme-use-cases-00.txt Status: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mattsson-acme-use-cases/ Htmlized: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-mattsson-acme-use-cases-00 Abstract: Contacting a CA is just one way in which a newly deployed HTTPS server can get hold of the certificate to use. This document describes additional (and common) use cases that fall into the major guiding use case for ACME as stated by [I-D.barnes-acme], "obtaining certificates for Web sites". Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org<http://tools.ietf.org>. The IETF Secretariat
_______________________________________________ Acme mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
