Dear Authors, Before the IETF meeting, we check working group agendas for documents with IANA-related issues. We have notes about this document:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-ace-edhoc-oscore-profile-09 Sections 14.10-14.13 say, "When such a procedure is used, IANA will ask the designated expert(s) to approve the early allocation before registration. In addition, WG chairs are encouraged to consult the expert(s) early during the process outlined in Section 3.1 of [RFC7120]." However, Section 14.9 says, "When such a procedure is used, review and approval by the designated expert are also required, in order for the WG chairs to determine that the conditions for early allocation are met (see step 2 in Section 3.1 of [RFC7120])." Is this difference intentional? IANA will always ask experts to review early allocations that would require expert review for permanent allocation. However, the need to record this wasn't anticipated when RFC 7120 made Specification Required registries eligible for early registration. (It has been recorded in draft-baber-ianabis-rfc7120bis.) If you have any questions, just let us know. If you'd like to talk in person, you can find us next to the RFC Editor's table from Monday through Thursday. You can also request another review at any time by contacting us at [email protected]. For more information about IANA Considerations section requirements, please see https://www.iana.org/help/protocol-registration Best regards, Amanda Baber IANA _______________________________________________ Ace mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
