[Ace] Re: Zaheduzzaman Sarker's No Objection on draft-ietf-ace-revoked-token-notification-08: (with COMMENT)

[Marco Tiloca]

Hello Zaheduzzaman,




A Github PR where we have addressed your comments is available at [PR].



Thanks,
/Marco

[PR] https://github.com/ace-wg/ace-revoked-token-notification/pull/14


On 2024-07-11 10:14, Zaheduzzaman Sarker via Datatracker wrote:

Thanks a lot for your review! Please find in line below our detailed replies to your comments. Unless any concern is raised, we plan to soon merge this PR (and the other ones related to other received reviews), and to submit the result as version -09 of the document.

Zaheduzzaman Sarker has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-ace-revoked-token-notification-08: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)

Please refer tohttps://eur05.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ietf.org%2Fabout%2Fgroups%2Fiesg%2Fstatements%2Fhandling-ballot-positions%2F&data=05%7C02%7Cmarco.tiloca%40ri.se%7C5a303e7efd8e4b83642008dca1816f84%7C5a9809cf0bcb413a838a09ecc40cc9e8%7C0%7C0%7C638562824502304387%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=jinOWw2rk30N62H78Ec4%2FpABk%2BzAmakx7fzN3FFzlUA%3D&reserved=0 for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.

The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://eur05.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdatatracker.ietf.org%2Fdoc%2Fdraft-ietf-ace-revoked-token-notification%2F&data=05%7C02%7Cmarco.tiloca%40ri.se%7C5a303e7efd8e4b83642008dca1816f84%7C5a9809cf0bcb413a838a09ecc40cc9e8%7C0%7C0%7C638562824502314309%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=EsTg4UEjFPiFEAupz9jMbcjMx3lIScE9sN5nWCc2dtw%3D&reserved=0



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thanks for working on this specification. Thanks to Joerg Ott for the TSVART
review.

My review did not surface transport protocol related issues.However - can we
define/refer/describe "diff queries" in this document? The meaning might be
very obvious to the experts but describing it will improve the readablity of
this specification and avoid misconceptions.

==>MT







NEW:

>


<==

Just like the term "full query" (that, admittedly, is at least more intuitive), the term "diff query" here does not have an obvious meaning that experts are expected to be familiar with. In fact, both terms are introduced and specifically defined in the context of this document, when they first appear at the beginning of Section 5 "The TRL Endpoint" (see the two related bullet points). Yet, we have extended the bullet list in Section 1.1 "Terminology", in order to early and shortly mention the two terms "full query" and "diff query". That is: > * Full query: a type of query to the TRL, where the AS returns the token hashes of the revoked access tokens currently in the TRL and pertaining to the requester. Further details are specified in Section 5 and Section 6. > * Diff query: a type of query to the TRL, where the AS returns a list of diff entries, each related to one update occurred to the TRL and containing a set of token hashes pertaining to the requester. Further details are specified in Section 5 and Section 7.

--
Marco Tiloca
Ph.D., Senior Researcher

Phone: +46 (0)70 60 46 501

RISE Research Institutes of Sweden AB
Box 1263
164 29 Kista (Sweden)

Division: Digital Systems
Department: Computer Science
Unit: Cybersecurity

https://www.ri.se

OpenPGP_0xEE2664B40E58DA43.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key

OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
Ace mailing list -- ace@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to ace-le...@ietf.org