Christian Amsüss <christ...@amsuess.com> wrote:
>> We wrote something similiar for RFC8366 or 8995, but I think we ripped
>> most of it out. For instance, if a device had a valid IDevID with a
>> notBefore of 2021-02-01, and the RTC said 1980-01-01 [good old DOS
>> epoch], then one could be sure it was at least 2021-02-01!
> Does either of those have a versioned history? Without a change log in
> them, and no mention of the example DOS epoch discoverable in either, I
> couldn't find what was there.
Yes, DT and github.com/anima-wg/bootstrap.
I looked back a bunch coming up with:
https://github.com/anima-wg/anima-bootstrap/blob/5f2527381c291af12f4f9df3c26feb1d079bda20/dtbootstrap-anima-keyinfra.txt
section 2.6.1... but thtat's really the same text as in the RFC.
Let' try git blame...
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-anima-bootstrapping-keyinfra-18#section-2.6.1
This might not be the last version that had this more complex text.
It seemed like it was riff for distracting review comments, and didn't really
help our primary focus, so it go removed sometime later.
Unfortunate that the version buttons on the right don't retain the section
number.
--
Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Ace mailing list Ace@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace
