Lars Eggert has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-ace-cmpv2-coap-transport-09: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ace-cmpv2-coap-transport/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- # GEN AD review of draft-ietf-ace-cmpv2-coap-transport-09 CC @larseggert Thanks to Meral Shirazipour for the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) review (https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/ihMGS0Wl8sdlJlzkSZU-hlm7wRE). ## Comments ### Boilerplate This document uses the RFC2119 keywords "SHOULD", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "OPTIONAL", "SHOULD NOT", "SHALL", "MAY", "RECOMMENDED", "SHALL NOT", "MUST NOT", "MUST", and "REQUIRED", but does not contain the recommended RFC8174 boilerplate. (It contains some text with a similar beginning.) ## Nits All comments below are about very minor potential issues that you may choose to address in some way - or ignore - as you see fit. Some were flagged by automated tools (via https://github.com/larseggert/ietf-reviewtool), so there will likely be some false positives. There is no need to let me know what you did with these suggestions. ### Section 4, paragraph 0 ``` 4. Security Considerations ``` Why is this a list of bullets instead of just regular text? ### Uncited references Uncited references: `[RFC5280]`. ### Outdated references Document references `draft-ietf-lamps-lightweight-cmp-profile-13`, but `-21` is the latest available revision. ### Grammar/style #### Section 2.3, paragraph 1 ``` ional and potentially large fields. Thus a CMP message can be much larger tha ^^^^ ``` A comma may be missing after the conjunctive/linking adverb "Thus". ## Notes This review is in the ["IETF Comments" Markdown format][ICMF], You can use the [`ietf-comments` tool][ICT] to automatically convert this review into individual GitHub issues. Review generated by the [`ietf-reviewtool`][IRT]. [ICMF]: https://github.com/mnot/ietf-comments/blob/main/format.md [ICT]: https://github.com/mnot/ietf-comments [IRT]: https://github.com/larseggert/ietf-reviewtool _______________________________________________ Ace mailing list Ace@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace
