On 29. Jun 2021, at 20:11, Daniel Migault <mglt.i...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > So here is the current text: > """ > CBOR is a binary encoding designed for small code and message size. > Self-contained tokens and protocol message payloads are encoded in CBOR when > CoAP is used. > """ > > I think Carsten is suggesting the text does not limit the use of CBOR to the > use of CoAP but eventually when other protocols are used..The difference is > that when CoAp is used there is a stronger insentive to use CBOR than when > CoAP is not used. If that is correct, we could clarify that by adding. ""When > used outside CoAP, the use of CBOR remains RECOMMENDED.""". > > Please provide some text that would address your concern.
That works very well for me. (My main concern is that the current text sounds like CBOR is only used in CoAP, while in reality CBOR remains the encoding of choice unless there is a good reason to use something else; this concern is addressed in a very precise way by your suggested wording.) Grüße, Carsten
_______________________________________________ Ace mailing list Ace@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace
