Zaheduzzaman Sarker has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-ace-oscore-profile-17: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ace-oscore-profile/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Thanks for this document. I support Roman's discuss and have similar observations when it comes to normative text usage (see Roman's discuss comments). Some nits below -- * Section 2: This profile RECOMMENDS the use of OSCORE between client and AS, to reduce the number of libraries the client has to support, but other protocols fulfilling the security requirements defined in section 5 of [I-D.ietf-ace-oauth-authz] (such as TLS or DTLS) MAY be used as well. [TLS, DTLS] reference is missing. * Section 3.2: Typo : s/parameeter/parameter _______________________________________________ Ace mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace
