On Oct 19, 2017, at 21:30, Hannes Tschofenig <[email protected]> wrote: > > For the cost saving of one byte we are essentially introduction options > here. I am wondering whether this byte is worth it.
Two bytes. It’s not really an option, as in every context there will be a single right way to do this. But yes, there are naked and tagged CWTs now. (If we only define the tagged version, very quickly there will be specs that define a “compressed CWT” that just leaves out those first two bytes…) Grüße, Carsten _______________________________________________ Ace mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace
