Hi all, Thank you all for the feedback on the group communication security discussion.
We noticed that two concerns have been raised with the current specification. 1) Symmetric keys do not provide source authentication. Here, most people on the mailing list agreed that symmetric keys provides basic security and is sufficient for lighting applications. It is not intended to be used in the wider internet for more sensitive group communication security use-cases. 2) How to ensure that the symmetric key group communication security solution is not used in situations it is not designed for? We propose to address the received feedback by making the following modifications to the document: 1) We will add an additional section where we specify how asymmetric cryptography can be used for secure group communication. This will help for all those cases where source authentication is desired. 2) Add a security considerations section where we explain that the asymmetric key solution is the recommended approach but that there are situations where low latency group communication makes it difficult to use asymmetric cryptography and where source authentication is less important. You could call it an applicability statement. If this proposed modifications makes sense then we can try to submit a new draft with these changes. Abhinav ________________________________________________________ The contents of this e-mail and any attachments are confidential to the intended recipient. They may not be disclosed to or used by or copied in any way by anyone other than the intended recipient. If this e-mail is received in error, please immediately notify the sender and delete the e-mail and attached documents. Please note that neither the sender nor the sender's company accept any responsibility for viruses and it is your responsibility to scan or otherwise check this e-mail and any attachments. _______________________________________________ Ace mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace
