As someone who works in embedded systems in a horrible train-wreck of C++, I second this heartily.
On Thu, Dec 19, 2024 at 7:02 AM Cyber Fonic <cyberfo...@gmail.com> wrote: > I admire the cross-compilation capabilities of Plan9. Compared to gcc and > Clang, Plan9 C compilers appeal to my sense of aesthetics. There are some > utilities that I would like to port to browser environments and I am loath > to use plan9port sources and thus wrangle with gcc, etc. > > I totally concur with Nicklaus Wirth: "Increasingly, people seem to > misinterpret complexity as sophistication, which is baffling -- the > incomprehensible should cause suspicion rather than admiration." > > On Thu, 19 Dec 2024 at 00:20, gnufan42 via 9fans <9fans@9fans.net> wrote: > >> > Does anybody know of any implementation of Plan9 C compiler targeting >> WASM ? >> >> I don't think there is one. I found a project that claims to be a >> WebAssembly port of Plan9 not long time ago: >> https://github.com/xphung/plan9_webasm, and they used Emscripten. If you >> want a Plan9 C compiler targeting WASM you'll probably have to make one >> yourself, although I could be wrong. >> >> Would you mind to share your use case? >> > *9fans <https://9fans.topicbox.com/latest>* / 9fans / see discussions > <https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans> + participants > <https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/members> + delivery options > <https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/subscription> Permalink > <https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/T006f3c21a31ae0c0-M6b0ff8378bd25bf78ab4b8e6> > ------------------------------------------ 9fans: 9fans Permalink: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/T006f3c21a31ae0c0-M2e2746e37fee0044fdd51d86 Delivery options: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/subscription
