On 6/1/22, Steve Simon <st...@quintile.net> wrote: > for performance testing why not copy from ramfs on one machine to ramfs on > another?
ramfs is single-process and thus quite slow. > the suggestion from a 9con passim was to have fossil/cwfs/hjfs etc add a Qid > type flag to files indicating they are from backing store (QTSTABLE ?)and > thus may be copied in parallel. devices and synthetic would not normally > have this flag forcing the read or write be sequential. yeah, that's what my comment about readahead is based on. this work has been already done at least for cwfs. ------------------------------------------ 9fans: 9fans Permalink: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/T769854fafd2b7d35-M4ded96baa1173c231b64685d Delivery options: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/subscription
