Interesting idea!
This assumes the downstream servers have identical namespace hierarchy; right?
State management could be messy or impossible unless some sort of
transaction structure is imposed on the {walk, [open/create,
read/write]|[stat/wstat], clunk} sequences, where the server that
replies to walk first, gets that transaction.
On Sat, May 28, 2022 at 9:04 AM <fge...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Has anybody considered (or maybe even implemented) a 9p server to
> multiply incoming 9p messages to 2 or more 9p servers?
> Maybe with 2 different strategies for responding to the original request?
> 1. respond as soon as at least 1 response from one of the 9p servers
> is received,
> 2. respond only after all responses had been received.
> thanks!
------------------------------------------
9fans: 9fans
Permalink:
https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/T769854fafd2b7d35-M86625b23fdf7710ba07da4a4
Delivery options: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/subscription
