I’ve started toying with that very idea Lucio, but I haven’t had much time to really vet the ideas. My work has been specifically for 9front and rcpu
> On Jul 18, 2021, at 9:53 PM, Lucio De Re <lucio.d...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 7/19/21, adr via 9fans <9fans@9fans.net> wrote: >> [ ...]. Running samterm locally is way more efficient than >> using X forwarding. >> > I have adopted on my Linux (Mint) workstations - plural - the paradigm: > > ssh -fX remote acme -l lib/task.acme # for different tasks > > and it works even remotely pretty adequately. The remotes tend to be > pretty slick Debian servers, but even locally that is a boon (NetBSD > rules the Posix roost in my office). > > What I can't do is to do the same from the Plan 9 workstation that I > still prefer for development. I was bemoaning this in some notes to > myself just before reading the exchange. > > Now, it is very common, even after all these years of Plan 9 use, for > me to miss the wood for the trees. I think, not very deeply, that P9P > "cpu" running on the remote Posix server might be what I need - Plan 9 > SSH and I seem to be sworn enemies and X-fdorwarding is not even a > twinkle in SSH's eye - and here I note that Steve Simon's cpu server > for Windows has not been included in P9P (I heard Steve bring that up, > but I have never explored it as I don't own a Windows platform). > > In short, is it out of the question to cpu into a Posix server to > initiate an acme session, rather than using SSH to forward X? > > Lucio. ------------------------------------------ 9fans: 9fans Permalink: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/T09fcdec9c87bfde4-M6851a6eec7243162cd9dc1d7 Delivery options: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/subscription
