hiro: The purpose of doing this was not to just access multiple parts of the file. I was working off the quote below. Maybe a file server thats purpose is to mux parts of another file sounded like fun. My thoughts are that you could then transer thoes chunks on a single destination on seperate connections.
eg. % mux -C 3 -F large.file % tree. ├── large.file └── large.file.mux ├── 1 ├── 2 └── 3 1 directory, 4 files Like I said though still learning though. On Wednesday, 30 December 2020, at 12:20 AM, cigar562hfsp952fans wrote: > There is, however, a very simple reason why this approach won't really work: the fids for a file opened on one connection won't be recognized by the server on the other connection. ------------------------------------------ 9fans: 9fans Permalink: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/Te69bb0fce0f0ffaf-Mb319f4f5aae92c0b9de48f76 Delivery options: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/subscription
