> But where I only partially agree is where Plan 9 concepts contradict > what may be "common practice". A URL is a well defined object and > adopting it as a standard, as quite a few services have done (I'm > thinking PostgreSQL and OpenLDAP, for example) rather than pursue the > '!' convention seems worth it.
Yes. git9 takes URLs. This is why I posted a link to the spec that we should follow. I will take patches that bring us in compliance with https://raw.githubusercontent.com/git/git/master/Documentation/urls.txt ------------------------------------------ 9fans: 9fans Permalink: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/T9c456b888b0c38ed-M7a6698b405c29b6ede1b51df Delivery options: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/subscription
