> I just updated it with a suggestion for the RISC-V letters. How about i for rIscv32 and j for riscv64 (one more than i)?
I used n for nios2. na and aux/na commands are distinct, and I wouldn't expect SYM53C8XX microcode and nios2 object code to appear in the same context. > Is there a technical reason (beside fonts that do not cover them) not > to use a Unicode values for the first letter? They're a bit harder to produce on the keyboard.
