well, finding bugs is always good :) but since i got curious could you also tell which things exactly got much faster, so that we know what might be possible?
On 10/14/18, FJ Ballesteros <n...@lsub.org> wrote: > yes. bugs, on my side at least. > The copy isolates from others. > But some experiments in nix and in a thing I wrote for leanxcale show that > some things can be much faster. > It’s fun either way. > >> El 13 oct 2018, a las 23:11, hiro <23h...@gmail.com> escribió: >> >> and, did it improve anything noticeably? >> >>> On 10/13/18, Charles Forsyth <charles.fors...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> I did several versions of one part of zero copy, inspired by several >>> things >>> in x-kernel, replacing Blocks by another structure throughout the >>> network >>> stacks and kernel, then made messages visible to user level. Nemo did >>> another part, on his way to Clive >>> >>>> On Fri, 12 Oct 2018, 07:05 Ori Bernstein, <o...@eigenstate.org> wrote: >>>> >>>> On Thu, 11 Oct 2018 13:43:00 -0700, Lyndon Nerenberg >>>> <lyn...@orthanc.ca> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Another case to ponder ... We're handling the incoming I/Q data >>>>> stream, but need to fan that out to many downstream consumers. If >>>>> we already read the data into a page, then flip it to the first >>>>> consumer, is there a benefit to adding a reference counter to that >>>>> read-only page and leaving the page live until the counter expires? >>>>> >>>>> Hiro clamours for benchmarks. I agree. Some basic searches I've >>>>> done don't show anyone trying this out with P9 (and publishing >>>>> their results). Anybody have hints/references to prior work? >>>>> >>>>> --lyndon >>>>> >>>> >>>> I don't believe anyone has done the work yet. I'd be interested >>>> to see what you come up with. >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Ori Bernstein >>>> >>>> >>> >> > > >
