> Still a lot of coverity defects are actually false positives. > I try to signal here only the actual bugs but I might be wrong, thus let me > know if you find these report useless and I will stop to annoy the list.
i cannot predict the future nor tell you how to spend your time. i'm *not* claiming that using static code analysis to find bugs is "useless" per se. but consider the context in which problems would occur, maybe even describe how a bug would manifest itself in some code (thats what takes the time or wastes our time when you do not do this), and not just blindly present the coverty output as a proof. -- cinap
