On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 10:36:44AM -0700, erik quanstrom wrote: > > This is tantamount to saying acme is superior because you are better at > > acme. [...] > > c'mon man. you follow this with several paragraphs of opinion which appear > to say that acme is not better because you don't like it.
Yes, having explicitly set the dimensions of the field, I proceeded to stay in bounds. > but then again, editors don't tend to lead to logical arguments. :-) I've never seen it happen, and I don't really expect to. I do maintain that calling acme an editor is akin to calling New York a shopping center. khm
