> so why do we have so many un-coordinated versions of drawterm? because nobody reads their mail ever. perhaps one of you guys can put this in though?
i think it's good that someone who can't test his code changes doesn't commit to the "main" repo without giving disclaimers. In my experience enquiries via mail about the status of the code do get replies, so it's not too bad :) ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: hiro <23h...@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2012 16:49:45 +0200 Subject: Re: drawterm 9c9f289188ff To: Russ Cox <r...@swtch.com> you're back, cool here's a patch for this. On 7/14/12, Russ Cox <r...@swtch.com> wrote: > sorry, i thought it was unused. > I have put the variable back. > > feel free to try mouse wheel support. i am not sure whether it ever worked. > my memory of drawterm is fading. > > russ > > > On Monday, May 28, 2012 at 8:17 PM, hiro wrote: > >> hi russ, >> >> this change breaks building the windows drawterm here. What's the >> rationale behind it?! >> >> http://code.swtch.com/drawterm/changeset/9c9f289188ff/raw/ >> Also, did mouswheel support ever work? Would it make sense for me to >> try working it out? >> >> case WM_MOUSEWHEEL: >> if ((int)(wparam & 0xFFFF0000)>0) >> b|=8; >> else >> b|=16; > > > >
russ.patch
Description: Binary data
